Jon Russo reading post 5 Humans in the Landscape pg 258-279

One of the most broad definitions is to continue a process over time. Humans have many processes that are not sustainable yet but in order for them to continue they need to be. Transportation, power, clothing, food. It is all mass-produced at a costly way for the planet. The realization seems to be a hard one for many humans, factories still pollute in many areas, cars depend on a fuel that is not viable forever and emits pollution into the air as well, meat is farmed and takes over too much land all of these things are not sustainable. So how can we call ourselves the most successful species if we are going to destroy ourselves? All of these processes have a sustainable route, the economics don't always back it up just yet but there have been innovations in power, transportation, agriculture, textiles, meat, and many other industries that try to support a growing population where everyone is individualized. I don't believe we can call ourselves the most successful species; technically we meet those criteria but a species that destroys every other species and itself in this process can not be the most successful. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nature Walk

Haley Conroy - 2/14/23 - John Muir - (Outside of Class Reading)

Makenna Sowards—Free Response 3, Vegetarianism